7/29/09

What do these dates have in common?

May 11, May 24, June 14, June 29, July 7?

How about if you add April 13 and May 18?

The first group of dates are the only days on which Brian Stokes has given up an earned run.  

The other two?  Unearned runs.

In 39 games (41 2-3 innings), Stokes has only given up earned runs five times.  Adding in the two times unearned runs scored against him, that’s only seven outings where Stokes has allowed runs.Stokes

Of the 23 inherited runners that Stokes has been charged with dealing with, 23% have scored.

When Stokes allows runs, though, they come in bunches.  Here are the earned runs he allowed…

  • May 11: 1 ER
  • May 24: 5 ER
  • June 14: 4 ER
  • June 29: 4 ER
  • July 7: 2 ER

Hence his 3.46 ERA in 2009.

Update on Francoeur’s hand

In a profile piece for the Daily News, writer Kristie Ackert updates us on Jeff Francoeur’s hand.

Francoeur took a fastball off the side of his left hand in the sixth inning. The hand was bruised and swollen, but X-rays taken during the game showed there was no broken bone. He remained in the game.

"I'll tape it up the next few days, it should be fine," Francoeur said.

But, as the article says, you’re a Met now.  That’s not how it works.  You should spend three days on the bench claiming you’re ready to play, then two more where you’re unavailable.  Then there will be a day where no one will know if you’re able to play or not.  Finally, you’ll go on the disabled list and never be heard from again.

That’s how it works with this team.

Manuel’s Musing

Manuel's Musing “I don't really have enough time to entertain all these things. My job of managing 25 men keeps me busy enough.”

-Jerry Manuel on Minayagate

Mets players help design merch, fail miserably

There’s black jersey ugly.  There’s Mercury Mets ugly.  And then there’s this.ShirtSome Mets players have “designed” jerseys and shirts with their own personal flair.  I’ve never seen such a train wreck.

Here’s an excerpt from the MLB article:Shirt

Murphy built off his Irish heritage by infusing the Mets' classic road look with both the color green and a logo of a clover over his signature.

Parnell went with "earth tones" -- brown with camouflage lettering -- to give his merchandise an outdoors look that is big in his native North Carolina.

Putz strove for a patriotic feel, going with  a camouflage jersey with red, white and blue lettering. Putz also produced an elaborate T-shirt design with his name in gothic letters above  two eagles and a home plate bearing the Mets' interlocking "NY" logo.

Santos paid homage to his native country with a Mets logo that integrated the Puerto Rican flag in the background. His T-shirt consisted of a big picture of Santos in catching gear.

You really have to see all of them.  They’re just that bad.

Thankfully it’s just for fashion and none of the Mets will be running onto the field in this garbage.

Click here to see the store.  Try not to laugh too hard.

7/28/09

Game Chat: COL @ NYM [Game 99]

Jason Marquis (12-6, 3.49 ERA) vs. Mike Pelfrey (7-6, 4.99 ERA)

Join in for some game gabbing and barstool banter with your fellow fans!

(Chat removed, as usual.)

Hit the comments to discuss the Mets 4-0 victory over the Rockies...

Lineup for Game 99

It’s been working, so Jerry Manuel’s sticking it.

  1. Angel Pagan – CF
  2. Luis Castillo – 2B
  3. David Wright – 3B
  4. Daniel Murphy – 1B
  5. Jeff Francoeur – RF
  6. Cory Sullivan – LF
  7. Brian Schneider – C
  8. Alex Cora – SS
  9. Mike Pelfrey - RHP

Mets sign Adam Pettyjohn

In a move to add to the Buffalo rotation, the Mets signed Adam Pettyjohn, a lefty who has been with seven different organizations in 11 years.

Pettyjohn was last with the Cincinatti Reds, where he was 1-6 with a 4.68 ERA and 1.760 WHIP in 50 innings.

Since Jon Niese was promoted and Brandon Knight was released, the Bisons had some holes to fill in the starting rotation.  He’s one plug to those holes.

NY NY Sports Sports goes to Citi Field

NY NY Sports SportsMandeep and Shavarish, from NY NY Sports Sports, took their first trip to Citi Field last night.

Join their fan page on Facebook and view the photo album here.

As you can tell, I love these two guys.

SNY, PLEASE!

Tracking David Wright [Day 17]

David Wright, 7/27: 2-3, 2 R, BB, K

AVG: .321 (Change from previous game: +.003, Change from Game 81: -.005)

OBP: .412 (Change from previous game: +.003, Change from Game 81: -.002)

SLG: .458 (Change from previous game: +.002, Change from Game 81: –.012)

image imageimage

My words on the Rubin / Minaya tiff

Barring some unforeseen changes to the situation between Adam Rubin and Omar Minaya, here is my take on the matter.

One of the first things I learned in my journalism classes was to never make yourself part of the story.  Yesterday, Rubin had no control over it.  Minaya pulled his name out and tried to drag it through the mud.  Rubin had to respond with a press conference of his own to clear up the insanity.

Most people are taking sides on it, but I stand firmly in the middle.  Both parties were wrong.

Rubin, though interested in a job in baseball, should not continually (or even once) “lobby” for a position or even inquire with officials of the team he is covering.  Maybe another team, in another league.  Maybe.  Otherwise, this just seems like a huge conflict of interest if anyone does lend a hand his way while he may be covering the team.

Edit: Rubin said something to the effect of talking to people about a career in baseball. That might not be lobbying (hence the " ") but it is something to note.  Minaya could be fabricating this “continuing lobbied” story, or it could be true.  Even if Rubin once asked Jeff Wilpon or anyone else with the Mets about a job with the team, I think he crossed some line.

Minaya, though somewhat just in his suspicions, should not have slapped this on Rubin during the press conference that was being broadcast on TV.  If he took Rubin aside and spoke to him, that would have been fine.

Rubin should, and has, stood by his reporting.  His articles brought to light a very serious matter within the Mets and they conducted their own investigation because of it.  The team must have found something to back up Rubin’s story, otherwise Tony Bernanzard would still be employed.

Sure, it could have just come from fan pressure that they let Bernazard go, but I don’t see that being the reason.  They must have found a red flag (or a few) in order to go through with canning a dear friend of Minaya and Jeff Wilpon.

Rubin did some great reporting to break the story and defended himself against the acqusations that he was gunning for Bernazard’s job.  But Rubin did trip up in his press conference and appearance on TV afterwards.

He said, on many occasions, that he doesn’t know how he’s going to cover the Mets anymore after this.

That’s a big no-no to me.  As a journalist, you have to stay emotionally separate from your story or beat.  You cannot spill emotion into a news article.  That’s for a columnist or fluff article.  You must report the facts whether you like them or not, because what you think as a reporter doesn’t really matter.

If you do see a discrepancy or some fault, you can further investigate, but your personal feelings should never, ever creep into your articles.

If he believes that, as a reporter, he won’t be able to continue to find the true facts on the team, that may be one thing.  I don’t believe that was what he was alluding to, though.

So both Minaya and Rubin were at fault.  Minaya should not lose his job over this.  Either should Rubin (though as he said, he doesn’t know how he’s going to cover the team anymore).  Both probably said things they would take back in a second.

This story seems like it has some legs and will keep chugging along for a few days, at the least.  As a journalist, it is fascinating and horrifying to watch. 

It might be more exciting than the Mets season.