9/23/09

Mets fire top Latin America scout and Luis Aguayo

In a report for the Daily News, Adam Rubin reports that the Mets have fired Ramon Pena, “the organization’s top official in charge of signing Latin American talent.”

The Mets also fired Luis Aguayo, who was the minor-league field coordinator and also served a stint as first base coach last season.  Sandy Johnson, vice president of scouting, also plans on retiring.

Looks like the Mets are none-too-pleased with their minor league system, both in terms of signings and crafting them into major league ready players.

To me, this signals a sort of last-ditch effort by Omar Minaya and the Wilpons to save face in this dismal season.  These firings cast the notion that these people are the reason the team is losing and shedding them will help the team in the future.

This reeks of desperation.

Now you need to keep you eye on who fills these roles.

9/22/09

Misch out of rotation; Lineup for Game 152

Jerry Manuel confirmed to reporters that Pat Misch will be pulled from the rotation for the rest of the season, likely to be replaced by Tobi Stoner or Lance Broadway, reports Adam Rubin.

I’m torn.  On one hand, why not let Misch keep pitching for the rest of the year?  What’s two or three more starts and possible losses? 

On the other hand, I do want to see what the Mets have in Stoner and Broadway.  Doesn’t look like either can be an impact player for next year, but they are under the team’s control and could help a few years down the road.  Let’s get a preview now.

And here’s the lineup they will run out at Citi Field tonight…

  1. Angel Pagan – LF
  2. Luis Castillo – 2B
  3. David Wright – 3B
  4. Carlos Beltran – CF
  5. Daniel Murphy – 1B
  6. Jeff Francoeur – RF
  7. Brian Schneider – C
  8. Anderson Hernandez – SS
  9. Nelson Figueroa - RHP

Poll Results: Fans say Santos shouldn’t be the starter in 2010

In my latest poll, I asked fans if they want to see Omir Santos as the starting catcher next year. Here are the results…imageI’m not sure who I would want manning every game behind the plate next year, so if you have any suggestions, I’d like to hear them.

And please, don’t say Josh Thole.

Next Poll: Who will you root for in the playoffs?

Manuel’s Musing

Manuel's Musing “What you try to do after you're down eight, is try to figure out if you have enough pitching to get through the series.”

-Jerry Manuel on being down by eight

Two problems

Here are two things that troubled me with the Mets box score from last night’s 11-3 loss to the Braves.

First, of course, is the pitching lines, specifically the first two…PitchingPat Misch and Lance Broadway didn’t have good nights, did they?

Secondly, not so much from the box score, but still a troubling sight…HomeRunsWhen Daniel Murphy, who we all complain about not having enough power, is leading your team in home runs (with only 11, no less), something is seriously wrong.

9/21/09

Lineup for Game 151

How many games left?  Here’s the lineup…

  1. Angel Pagan – LF
  2. Luis Castillo – 2B
  3. David Wright – 3B
  4. Carlos Beltran – CF
  5. Daniel Murphy – 1B
  6. Jeff Francoeur – RF
  7. Josh Thole – C
  8. Wilson Valdez – SS
  9. Pat Misch - LHP

Twitter Poll: Should Milton Bradley be a Met in 2010?

There’s no denying that Milton Bradley is a character.  He’s been suspended for the rest of the 2009 season by the Chicago Cubs due to comments made to a newspaper about Cubs fans.

With two more years left on Bradley’s contract in Chicago, the Cubs may be looking to deal the embattled outfielder to avoid any future disasters.

So I asked my Twitter followers if they would want to see Bradley on the Mets in 2010.  Here are their responses… (It was pretty lopsided.)

YES

dmoneymania said: Yes. We need talent.

BlackMagic718 said: For Oliver Perez, sure. He'll help out the offense, and Ollie can be replaced with a QUALITY starter via free agency.

NO

awolf12 said: No. No way. Uh uh. Nyet. Nein. Nope. Thanks, but no thanks.

Lou_Bolkovic said: NO! Bradley brings too much baggage and is always an injury concern. After this season we need players who are durable.

cutiepie0319k said: NO! i just don't like him.

bosco86 said: No, Bradley is a nut case that Omar, Jerry, Wilpons cant control. if they didn’t want Manny why take Bradley.

Ryan_J_Smith said: No way. Milton Bradley is selfish, conceited, and a locker room cancer. He is the opposite of what the Mets need right now

YaGottaBKiddnMe said: NO way. Because of his mental issues. We don't need that in our clubhouse. I think he may be utter poison.

julierubes said: No. The cities & fans of NY and Chi aren't all that different: criticism everywhere. If he can't handle Chi, NY isn’t better.

shyonelung said: no. Clubhouse cancer and a general idiot.

jnetty99 said: Bradley said "I need a stable, healthy, enjoyable environment,". Mets might have enjoyable but not healthy or stable

DhmkJp said: Absolutely not because the Mets need to go with a youth/power/speed outfielder next year and Bradley provides none of that.

swirlywand said: Are you kidding? Trying to test the ridiculously outrageous responses to such a SILLY question? LOL- No, in 43 languages!

swirlywand continued: Maybe we can get Elijah Dukes for Brian Schneider...you know, to make sure Beltran is flanked by not one, but TWO SHOWBOATS

gwong said: F*ck no to Milton Bradley on the Mets. He is the definition of clubhouse cancer.

And from the peanut gallery…

Retire31 said: Yes, only if Bradley causes Jerry Manuel to take off his shirt and start a brawl with him.

EliFromBrooklyn said: I would love to have Milton Bradley on the Mets. He is all about fun! The game creator Milton Bradley, that is.

drsexington said: My litmus test: If they fit in better with the 1992-93 Mets than the current ones, bad choice#vincecoleman #bretsaberhagen

Jeff Francoeur is the talk of the Mets blog-o-sphere

There is a lot of hype surrounding Jeff Francoeur and his role on the 2009 team and what lies ahead for him.  Let’s take a look around some Mets blogs about what they have to say about the Atlanta import…Fenchy Shadows

MLB - Francoeur stays hot in Mets win vs. Nats

The Mets believe Francoeur will look sharp in their 2010 uni, so much so that they are inclined to approach him about signing him to a three-year contract that would allow him to become a big league Beau Brummel, if he so chose. They like what they have seen of him in and out of uniform -- from his spirited demeanor to his nuclear arm to the two doubles he produced Saturday afternoon in their victory against the Nationals.

Mets Fever - Is Jeff Francoeur our Paul O'Neill

Since coming to the Mets, Francoeur has been impressive, he's a decent fielder with a great arm and loves to use it, all the while hitting .315 ( 60 gms) with 33 RBIs and 7 HRs.

But whats been more important is the intangibles that he's brought to the table, he seemed to immediately become a main clubhouse figure and team leader.

He brings a hard nosed, passion to the team that has been missing for years. Playing through a thumb injury in meaningless games because he wants to.

Mets Merized Online - Mets To Offer Jeff Francoeur 3-Year Deal

Francoeur has been the lone bright spot for the Mets in the second half as he continues to sizzle at the plate. He came through again in yesterday’s win over the Nationals with two more doubles, an RBI and two runs scored.

Noble correctly states that signing Francoeur for the next few seasons would stabilize two-thirds of the outfield and five-eighths of the starting lineup for next season. His presence on the team has reduced Ryan Church to just a blur.

Mets Lifers - Jeff Francoeur is Mr. Met

Jeff Francoeur may be the lone bright spot of this lost season, but it's not this season that has me excited about the man with a rocket arm.

Francoeur is a heaven sent gift. The Mets haven't had a reliable arm in right since...think about it...since Strawberry? Oh wait, I forgot about Richard Hidalgo...right. Francoeur won't be the power bat and potential MVP candidate that Straw was but he's the first legitimate right fielder the Mets have had in what seems like the better part of two decades.

The Real Dirty Mets Blog - Make it or Break it: Jeff Francoeur - Starting Right Fielder in 2010?

I can’t look at the positives without mentioning his faults though. Jeff does not have the best eye at the plate, as evidenced by his lifetime OBP of .311 (ouch!) as well as his average of 120 strike outs per season. Another detriment to keeping Frenchie is his prolonged slump from 2008 through the end of his tenure in Atlanta earlier this season. In that time, he held a batting average under .250 and an on-base percentage under .300. If the Mets pay Francoeur $5 million next season, and he regresses to similar statistics, he would probably lose the starter’s job and Omar might take some of the blame.

Mets MD - Why Jeff Francoeur for 3 years is a bad idea

You want a 3 year contract, Noble? For a guy who has been worth -9.1 runs? He has been worse offensively than an average hitter. The track record is against him. He has the worst plate discipline on the team, swinging at 35% of pitches outside the strikezone. He is not good at baseball. You know who's better, and cheaper? Bobby Abreu. So, for once, Omar/Wilpons/who ever is the GM, make the right decision. Because if we sign Francoeur for 3 years, I'm done.

NY Baseball Digest – Jeff Francoeur Does Not Suck

- Unlike the other 24 guys on the roster, he actually can hit the ball out of Citi Field

- He plays every day, even when his thumb is mangled like a pile up on the LIE.
---
The hate for Francoeur is beyond me. He embodies all that is good with professional baseball. Why would you hate someone that works hard to improve himself, wants to win, and has fun doing it? Can you win with eight Jeff Francoeur’s in the lineup? Of course not. But you could say the same for most players this side of Albert Pujols and no one is looking to throw them away.

Amazin’ Avenue – Jeff Francoeur’s Intangibles

Talk about Francoeur's statistics.  Talk about his on-field performance (and the sites listed above generally do, to varying degrees).  When doing so, don't completely ignore the 2500+ major league plate appearances he had before coming to Flushing.  But please stop pretending intangibles are a significant consideration when deciding what to do with Francoeur this offseason.  Character counts, but since we can't sufficiently evaluate it objectively let's stick to what we can evaluate.  Leave the largely irrelevant intangibles topic for talk radio, the lowest common denominator of baseball discourse.  (Next up on the talk radio docket, a discussion about how David Wright and Jose Reyes aren't "winning ballplayers"!)

Where do you stand on Jeff Francoeur?

9/20/09

Manuel’s Musing

Manuel's Musing “If you were to talk intangibles, he'd rate way off the charts.”

-Jerry Manuel on Jeff Francoeur

9/19/09

Delgado’s year likely done

Carlos Delgado, who was trying to make a return to the major leagues after hip surgery this season, may not be healthy enough to come back.

“I think time is running out for him,” Jerry Manuel told reporters before Friday’s game.

It’s unfortunate for Delgado who is without a contract for next season.  Though he’s pretty much built for the American League for the rest of his career, some have rumored that the Mets may bring him back in an incentive laden deal as a placeholder for Ike Davis in 2011.

Obviously, that would put Daniel Murphy back to the minor leagues, which wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.

But, I don’t think Delgado is a smart signing at this point.  He’s in the twilight of his career and missed so much time this year, who knows where he’s going to be for next year?

I’m just glad I’m not Omar Minaya.